On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 20:51 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:44:05AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Yes, that is true, but meanwhile give a testing to them, especially > > regressio > > test the new patches. I can't merge new patches in until I'm sure they > > don't > > cause regressions. > > OK, I give it a thumbs-up on a first boot - it's running my FC5 > filesystem without any trouble. I'll keep playing with it and let you > know of any trouble. I haven't been able to run FC4/FC5 x86 filesystems with any of the patches floating around. (on amd64 host)
> Attached is a tarball of the patches merged after the patches I have > planned for 2.6.17. Nothing major, just some fuzz, some Makefile > rejections, and rejections from some whitespace cleanup in > kernel/skas/process_kern.c. I couldn't figure out in which order I need to apply these (no series file) and I've ran out of time. Antoine
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
