On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively:
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote:
[jmp_buf goes hidden]
>> This vile patch lets me compile but is almost certainly not good enough:
>> however, I don't know what *is* good enough: now that glibc is blocking
>> us from the layout of the jmp_buf, what's to stop them from changing it?
>> (Well, other than that it would break the ABI ;) )
> I made the same thought, but no, they have *already* changed it.
> Search for the message from Ulrich Drepper

It's not easy to find it given that little info :(

>                                            (and if you understand 
> the "security reasons" I'd be curious to hear them);

Well, there are obvious security problems with having pointers in
jmp_buf exposed: attackers who can exploit a buffer overflow and know
the location of a jmp_buf and its layout can force someone to longjmp()
to any location they like, regardless of -fstack-protector tricks. Even
FORTIFY_SOURCE won't protect against it if the buffer overrun didn't use
strcpy() or a similarly fortified call.

>                                                      also the below patch is 
> available in Jeff's tree from some time.

Aha, great minds kludge alike ;)

> I asked Jeff to #ifdef that code out for 2.6.17 release (since the below 
> patch 
> was refused)... anyway Jeff found that we can take setjmp() implementation 
> from klibc and include it in UML.

Well, it wasn't ifdeffed out ;)

Using the uml setjmp() implementation seems like a good idea (or the uClibc 
one).

-- 
`NB: Anyone suggesting that we should say "Tibibytes" instead of
 Terabytes there will be hunted down and brutally slain.
 That is all.' --- Matthew Wilcox

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to