On 29 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:

> On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:03, Nix wrote:
>> This diff removes references to the conflicting-with-kernel-headers
>> skas_ptrace.h, and moves skas_ptrace.h into the um header
>> tree.
> Unaccurate - you move skas_ptrace.h into include/asm-i386, right?

Gah. Yes. Sorry, brainfart.

>> There are still some trees (PPC, IA64) with a copy of a 
>> skas_ptrace.h left and without ptrace-skas.h broken off from
>> ptrace.h: these may be broken by this change, but I can't test
>> them so I can't tell.
> This change is plain wrong this way, if my reasoning is correct. 
>
> arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.o is in USER_OBJS, so it is compiled against host 
> headers.
> You cannot _depend_ on them including the SKAS patch, as I said. And that 
> header is in arch/um/include to be includable by both kernelspace and 
> userspace files...

Oh, hell, true. The problem is that we'll have to cater for people who
*have* included the skas headers, including the old ones...

... fixed patch coming in a bit (shopping and 2.6.19 upgrade first).

-- 
`The main high-level difference between Emacs and (say) UNIX, Windows,
 or BeOS... is that Emacs boots quicker.' --- PdS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to