On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:45:26 +0100 Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, I've been resurrecting lately remap_file_pages protection support > for UML. > > I've updated it to 2.6.20 and it passes its unit test, and the > resulting kernel has no stability problems in my experience on my Dual Core > laptop (I've been using it for long time). > > Since last time I sent it, I've fixed remaining problems and TODOs, and > cleaned up the split (I'm just improving the way patches are split). Now it > is a patchset with 13 patches, and the diffstat is attached. > > Now I'm curious about when I should or could better send those patches - i.e. > when they bring less noise into the -mm tree? > > This would allow me to snapshot the git and/or -mm tree, test the patches > against that kernel with my unit testing program, and only then send these > patches to get them at least included into -mm. > > Any suggestion? Obviously if you want to see the code first, in the standard > way, I'll follow usual practice - just tell it me (and I'll send it shortly > anyway, if I get no answer). Just send them out, against next -mm please. Be sure to cc linux-mm. I'm going to have to ask other developers for more help reviewing and testing things like this in the future. Things just aren't working. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
