I just looked at what it would take to port SKAS3 to 2.6.25, and it
looks well beyond my C non-abilities.  Porting 2.6.23's SKAS3 to
2.6.24 was mostly an exercise in figuring out what code from
i386/x86_64 moved to where, but 2.6.24 to 2.6.25 seems to have
reworked a lot of the ptrace/ldt code.  Hopefully someone can step up
to the task.

That's not to say I won't eventually try, of course.  However, most of
my interest was vested in 2.6.24, as I wanted to upgrade my existing
UML base (based on Debian's 2.6.18 tree) to 2.6.24, as Debian will be
releasing "etchnhalf" with a 2.6.24 base.  And while it would be nice
to play with SKAS3 on a 2.6.25 host (for roughly the same reasons I
installed Red Hat Linux 5.2 as a UML guest this evening ("because I
can"; it actually works flawlessly with the latest 2.6 kernel even
though it was designed for 2.0.36)), it's not a priority for my
production guests.

RF

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to