On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:42:05AM -0700, David Shane Holden wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30:15AM -0700, David Shane Holden wrote:
> >> I tried to build a UML 2.6.26 kernel on Debian (32-bit) and ran into the
> >> same problem reported here http://marc.info/?t=121011533500002&r=1&w=2.
> >
> > It's really 2.6.26, and not something from a day or two earlier? I
> > fixed the compilation bugs, supposedly, just before 2.6.26.
>
> Yeah, it's a vanilla 2.6.26, and when comparing it to 2.6.26-rc9 the
> only difference in arch/um was the change for no-unit-at-a-time.
OK, I misunderstood - I thought you were saying you got compilation
errors, rather than crashes. Hence my incredulity, since that patch
was supposed to fix the compile errors.
> >
> >> If I use gcc 4.3 everything works fine, but if I use gcc 4.1 or 4.2,
> >> UML crashes on startup.
> >
> > If the crash says ptrace in it, then I'm currently trying to figure
> > out what's happening with that.
>
> It's crashing in wait_stub_done just like the poster of the message was
> having, it appears gcc 4.1 and 4.2 need -fno-unit-at-a-time.
Well, we need to figure out why the initcalls aren't happening with
-unit-at-a-time and some versions of gcc.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
