>From efc14bf16e1e0d95173875615da633722cc8e467 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

x86_64 defines either memcpy or __memcpy depending on the gcc version, and
it looks like UML needs to follow that in its exporting.

Cc: Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c
index 08f63e2..467879a 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c
@@ -13,5 +13,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed_trylock);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_wakeup);
 
 /*XXX: we need them because they would be exported by x86_64 */
+#if (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3) || __GNUC__ > 4
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy);
+#else
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy);
+#endif
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial);
-- 
1.5.5.1


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to