On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:51:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:50, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:48, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: >>>>Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode Linux >>>>built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because it doesn't work. It still doesn't work >>>>in current git. I complained about it not working back in January: >>>> >>>>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200901130159.04389.rob%40landley.net&forum_name=user- >>>>mode-linux-devel >>>>http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0901.2/00669.html >>>> >>>>And today, I bothered to track down why. >>>> >>>>This is the commit that broke it, when Peter Anvin merged x86 and x86-64 for >>>>ARCH=um: http://kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/rev/117978 >>>> >>>>Here's a patch that fixes it for me: >>> >>> Thanks, Bob! >> >> I've just did a build of plain v2.6.28 on amd64 aka x86-64. The >> resulting image ran fine. > >So I'm wondering: why does it work for me and not for you? >
It does work well x86_64, but my question is that whether this will break i386 or not, since before, CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES depends on EXPERIMENTAL on i386, this patch removes it. -- Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
