Am 07.06.2012 18:50, schrieb Alan Cox: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:32:42 +0200 > Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote: > >> Am 07.06.2012 18:37, schrieb Alan Cox: >>> Yes I know exactly what is going on. However getting a more tolerant >>> behaviour is going to take a couple more kernels. >>> >> >> So, then please tell me what's the proper way to fix the UML console >> driver? >> >> - tty_port plus ->hangup() works only with a patched util-linux >> - tty_port without ->hangup() seems to work only if *getty does not >> call vhangup() > > There isn't a nice one. It'll have to wait until 3.6/7 or so to get > fixed nicely and it won't backport either. >
Hmm, that's odd. What about the not nice ways? Having a ugly driver until 3.7 is better than having no driver... I'm wondering why does drivers/tty/vt/vt.c work? Can't I model the UML driver after it? Thanks, //richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
