Hi,

On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:03:31 +0800 Chen Gang F T 
<chen.gang.flying.transfor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When a module select "COMPILE_TEST=y" (e.g with allmodconfig), it has
> right to compile under the architecture which no related HW support.
> 
> If it can not pass compiling, at least it is not the module's issue,
> neither the architecture's issue.
> 
> We have to look for who has duty on it. At least now, it seems only
> 'asm-generic' can be qualified to play this unlucky role.

You keep saying this, but others have told you that this is not the
problem.

> Could you provide your suggestions or completions for this issue ?

If something doesn't build for a particular config, then either it needs
to be fixed or excluded from building in that particular config.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

Attachment: pgp8FzoVJldFI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to