Am 12.08.2014 16:46, schrieb Vivek Goyal:
> Richard and Daniel reported that UML is broken due to changes to resource
> traversal functions. Problem is that iomem_resource.child can be null
> and new code does not consider that possibility. Old code used a for loop
> and that loop will not even execute if p was null.
> 
> Revert back to for() loop logic and bail out if p is null.
> 
> I also moved sibling_only check out of resource_lock. There is no
> reason to keep it inside the lock.
> 
> Following is backtrace of the UML crash.

Shall I pickup this patch and route it via my uml tree to Linus?

Thanks,
//richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to