On Wednesday 20 April 2005 02:12, K. Richard Pixley wrote: > Sorry if this is an old topic, I'm a potential new UML user and I don't > see it mentioned on the web page. > > Should I expect a 2.4 based UML to run properly when hosted by a 2.6 > host system? Is this a common configuration? Yes, I'd say. > Any notable gotchas? * UML/2.4 is more unstable than UML/2.6 for many users (there are some still using it with success, anyway).
Don't run one older than 2.4.26-3um, they're known to fail, at least in TT mode, maybe even in SKAS mode, but I don't remember. That said, on my page there are two better (stabler and safer) 2.4 releases, 2.4.27-bs1 and 2.4.27-bs2-pre10. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
