On Friday 30 September 2005 15:23, Omar CHEIKHROUHOU wrote: > Selon Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Friday 30 September 2005 13:27, Omar CHEIKHROUHOU wrote: > > > Selon Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Friday 30 September 2005 08:54, Omar CHEIKHROUHOU wrote: > > > > > Selon Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I uses FC4 in the host.and i want to update the UML kernel to 2.6 but > > > as i have explained before the hostap_uml whish not to be loaded in 2.6 > > > kernel.
> > First thing, I'd like you to test that the UML-specific (as opposed to > > module-specific) bug is solved by the new 2.4 UML version. > which kernel do you mean ?? 2.4.28-bs2 should contain the fix. If it doesn't, it's another story. But I'm almost sure it has. > > Also, on the original page the author provides two different binaries for > > running on 2.4 hosts and on 2.6 hosts - using the right one, i.e. the one > > for 2.6 hosts, may help, especially since Vincent had ran the binary > > successfully on FC4 hosts. > i don't want i binary because i which to install some other protocol like > (openDiameter and PANA ) to simulate ad-hoc network. If you recompiled the UML kernel, you *must* recompile the UML Wifi module. And I'd add, that's your fault if you don't know that, sorry. And if you can recompile the Wifi module, you can use any 2.4 kernel. Also, you can at least try if the binary solves the problem - we must first debug where the problem lies, then solve it. So, if you say "neither 2.4.28-bs2 neither the binary for 2.6 hosts on Vincent Guffens's page work for me", it is one kind of problem, but I don't expect it (many people use successfully UML/2.4). Your kind of problem is likely, instead "I've used 2.4.24 UML, but it doesn't work, and I have problems, but I have never tried versions which are known to contain the fix". Now that I remember you've compiled the kernel on your own, the author says "a small patch was needed to make 2.4.24 work on 2.6 kernels". While you've used 2.4.24-1um without further changes. So, we are sure that kernel doesn't work on 2.6. Again: *) first solve the basic UML problem. *) then you can go to solving it on a kernel supporting the module, which means using 2.4.28-bs2 and recompiling the module, or asking Vincent Guffens to give the patch he used to make 2.4.24 work on top of 2.6 hosts. > what you propose for me to do! > really , I spend three week blocked in installing uml kernel.!!!! No, you've spent three weeks trying to run a 2.4.24-1um kernelwhich is known not to work on 2.6 hosts, on a 2.6 host. And you've not run other kernels which contain the fixes because the damn module "doesn't work on other kernel versions". But it does. It suffices to recompile it. > and i think that i will leave uml history! If you used 2.4.28-bs2 you would have no problem with UML. Ergo, it's not a UML problem. Become more responsive to my suggestion and I'll become nicer again. Sorry, but I'm getting tired. And above there are enough suggestion to progress on this. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
