On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:28:22AM -0700, Jim Carter wrote:
> Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix, but the
> interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of trying out the
> 2.6.16 UML kernel on a 2.6.16 host? Version skew, particularly backwards,
> is very plausible as an explanation for all of these. Also be sure that
> the guest and host are similar in wordsize, i.e. 32bit vs 64bit.
Neither version skew or word size mismatch should cause any problem.
Any version of UML should basically run on any host version. The only
exception I can think of would be a 2.6 UML on a 2.4 host - NPTL
support inside UML depends on host NPTL support.
Similarly, AFAIK, 32-bit UMLs run fine on x86_64.
Heff
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
