On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Alle 21:23, gioved?, 13. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> > The combination boots fine here - I wouldn't have put them up otherwise.
>
> But now I'm confused - one other mail stated to use 2.6.17 because versions
> before this weren't TLS-aware.
That kernel came from my development tree, which had the TLS patches
in it. However, I don't fiddle the kernel version to reflect that.
So, that kernel claimed to be 2.6.16, even though it was really 2.6.16
+ TLS patches + a bunch of other stuff.
> > What's your host?
>
> It's still the same stock Debian sarge with a 2.4.27 kernel.
> I'm SSH'ing into it and boot the UML binary without any special parameters.
> Does the host's threading implementation have any influence?
Yes. UML depends on the host supporting TLS in order for it to
support TLS itself.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
