Blaisorblade wrote: >> then all is well - just my >> inexperience showing. But it would also be nice to have an indication one >> way or the other in a prominent place. >> > > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it, > Antoine? > Sure, the only issue that I can think of is that all the 2.6.x kernels work with all the filesystems (for me anyway) and so the only thing that I could potentially add to the web pages is a warning for the filesystems that do require 2.6 (IIRC Fedora, SuSE, Mandriva, Ubuntu ? ...)
Note: most "older" filesystems can be made to work with kernel 2.4 with some minor surgery (ie: static dev,) But anything that is based on glibc >= 2.4 will not (confusing isn't it!) Getting a few people to report which combinations do/don't work would also be quite helpful. Antoine ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
