Keith Turner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
> Good call. I kind of forgot about BatchScanner threads and trying to factor
> those in:). I guess doing one thread in the BatchScanners would be more
> accurate.
>
> Although, I only had one TServer, so I don't*think* there would be any
> difference. I don't believe we have concurrent requests from one
> BatchScanner to one TServer.
There are, if the batch scanner sees it has extra threads and there
are multiple tablets on the tserver, then it will submit concurrent
request to a single tserver.
Hrm, curious then. I don't think I was oversaturating the physical
resources on my laptop, but who knows. I'll see if I can revisit this
experiment tonight to see if it changes anything. It was very easy to
get YCSB data up and ingested and then run this tool.
