That is what I recall as well Josh. It is confusing for sure. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> IIRC, a property being mutable in ZooKeeper is disjoint from whether it > will be dynamically reloaded. > > That is, a mutable ZK property does not imply that it is always > dynamically picked up. > > Billie Rinaldi wrote: > >> We already keep track of this in the Property class, whether a property >> can be changed in ZooKeeper and whether it requires a restart. Perhaps >> the information has grown stale, though. The information is exposed in >> the user manual: >> http://accumulo.apache.org/1.8/accumulo_user_manual#_tserver_port_client >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Christopher <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Right now, I think you'd probably have to track down where that >> particular property is used in the code to determine its lifecycle. >> I think it's going to take some work to wrangle these into discrete >> sets for documentation purposes, in the shell or otherwise. Some >> properties are only used during certain times early in the server's >> lifecycle. Other properties are used on demand. Some of those on >> demand properties are probably cached into internal state for >> indefinite periods of time. It's hard to say which are which without >> investigating each property individually (or through empirical >> testing). >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:04 PM Jeff Kubina <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> That would be very helpful, but a note in the documentation >> would be fine initially. Is there an easy way to determine this >> from the source code? >> >> -- >> Jeff Kubina >> 410-988-4436 <tel:(410)%20988-4436> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Christopher <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Some do, some don't. One thing we could add to the shell is >> a notification that a restart is necessary for a particular >> change. Possibly. >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016, 20:25 Dave <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I don't think so. >> >> >> On Oct 4, 2016 8:21 PM, Jeff Kubina >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Does changing the values of tserver configs in the >> accumulo shell, like "config -s >> tserver.server.threads.minimum=256", require a >> restart of all the tservers to become effective? >> >> >> >> >>
