Yes, just not familiar with the process. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aha, want to open a patch to fix the docs? > > Noe Detore wrote: > >> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/master/docs/src/main >> /asciidoc/chapters/replication.txt >> line 158 >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com >> <mailto:josh.el...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> What made you think that this is allowed to be a per-table property? >> If the docs are unclear, we should fix that. It is a global-only >> property. >> >> >> Noe Detore wrote: >> >> I noticed in replication.txt implied replication.work.assigner >> can be >> set per table >> >> table.root@accumulo_primary> config -t my_table -s >> >> replication.work.assigner=org.apache.accumulo.master.replica >> tion.SequentialWorkAssigner >> >> >> when trying to set for table: Invalid per-table property >> >> I assume replication.work.assigner can only be set for instance >> and not >> per table? >> >> Thanks >> Noe >> >> >>
