Folks interested in Python, Julia, Matlab/Octave bindings to Accumulo might look into d4m.mit.edu
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:50:57AM -0700, Noah Randolph wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Can you clarify the "multi user aspect?" Is it the ability to login as > multiple users through one client connection, or is it the ability to have > multiple users in general (beyond just root), or is it something else? > > Thanks, > Noah Randolph > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:03 AM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Architectural interest in the feature/product is a very different thing > > than interest in maintaining and testing said product ;) > > > > I read Christopher's reply in a "there isn't interest in contributing > > more to the service by the current, active developers" tone, in the > > spirit of ASF's "do-oracy" approach. We would be very welcome for people > > to come along and do more with it and separating it from the core > > repository helps individuals see the fruits of their labor much more > > quickly. > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html > > > > On 8/29/19 11:57 AM, Roberts, Geoffry [USA] wrote: > > > I am surprised to learn that there apparently is scant interest in > > > proxy. I think it is attractive to support multiple languages. From my > > > view, the well-being of Accumulo depends on it. Maybe I am wrong. > > > > > > *From: *Christopher <[email protected]> > > > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > *Date: *Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:31 AM > > > *To: *accumulo-user <[email protected]> > > > *Subject: *[External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server > > > > > > It was separated out so it could live or die on its own, as the case may > > > be. It hasn't received much development attention in awhile. > > > > > > A new version hasn't yet been released from this new repo. If there is > > > still interest, somebody will need to devote some resources to attend to > > > it. One thing I'd like to see is for it to drop the multi user aspect, > > > and to support a single user via the new 2.0 client properties. It could > > > be simplified greatly that way, and possibly easier to maintain, if > > > there's still interest. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 10:25 Mike Miller <[email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Yes it has been pulled from the main Accumulo 2.0 repository. The > > > proxy is now in its own repo here: > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo-proxy > > > < > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_accumulo-2Dproxy&d=DwMFaQ&c=f4NRRID3zFYDyClb0wZXwA&r=hc5v62HpZrcalgHOsVfthsgLhE5LrDVBm9xDs5ozH5U&m=7Up-S9F2rKbOkzCJgxhBsRFmB0ApKIbZU8v2xtMTBdo&s=aQSkYib3VNqayF7hd2x7X_MIqJhNV3u3LgrvCOacJ5w&e= > > > > > > > > > It should still work the same. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:17 AM Roberts, Geoffry [USA] > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > I hope this is a quick question. > > > > > > I downloaded a copy of Accumulo 2.0 and noticed it does not > > > contain proxy.properties. Has it been removed? Will it work > > > with an older version of the file? > > > > >
