UNOFFICIAL Thank you! Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2026 7:37 PM To: [email protected] Cc: McClure, Bruce MR 2 <[email protected]> Subject: Re: -EXT-Updates regarding Running Accumulo on AWS s3 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
⚠ EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. ⚠. Bruce, We have been running Accumulo on S3 for some time with petabytes of data using the S3A connector. It's not perfect due to the S3A connector but it works. We haven't benchmarked it but generally it goes the job done. Our workload is feeding a user interface with spatial data through GeoServer OGC Services. -Hulbs ________________________________ From: McClure, Bruce MR 2 via user <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 00:12 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: McClure, Bruce MR 2 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: -EXT-Updates regarding Running Accumulo on AWS s3 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> WARNING: This message is from an external source. Evaluate the message carefully BEFORE clicking on links or opening attachments. UNOFFICIAL Hi, I am just wondering if there is any update since the advice in 2019 that said Accumulo can run on S3 as long as the root and metadata tables are in HDFS? Has any performance benchmarking been done comparing Accumulo running on S3 versus HDFS? (for comparable hardware/networking configuration). Thank you, Bruce.
