Thank you for your follow-up and interest in the progress of Ambari 3.0. Based 
on the current situation, there is still some work to be done for the release 
of Ambari 3.0, especially due to limited resources within the community. In 
particular, there is a shortage of front-end developers. If you are interested 
in contributing, your participation would be highly welcomed. It is estimated 
that the official release may take another 1-2 months.

We will continue to closely monitor the development progress and keep you 
informed as soon as there are further updates. If you have any other questions 
or need additional assistance during this period, please feel free to contact 
us.

Thank you again for your patience and understanding.

> On Jan 3, 2025, at 13:46, arjun s <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> hi
> I wanted to follow up on my earlier query regarding the estimated timeline or 
> expected release date for Ambari 3.0. We are keen to plan our migration and 
> upgrades effectively, and any update on this would be highly appreciated.
> 
> If there’s any additional information or context needed from my side, please 
> let me know.
> Best regards,
> Arjun
> 
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 10:18 AM arjun s <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for confirming that Ambari 2.7.9 does not support RHEL 8 or RHEL 9 
> and that the upcoming Ambari 3.0 release will address this with major updates.
> 
> Could you kindly share an estimated timeline or expected release date for 
> Ambari 3.0? 
> This information will help us plan our migration and upgrades accordingly.
> 
> Thank you for your assistance!
> 
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 6:30 AM Jialiang Cai <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Ambari 2.7.9 does not support RHEL 8 or RHEL 9, but the next release of 
> Ambari will provide support. The next version, 3.0, will be a major release, 
> bringing many important updates.
> 
>> On Dec 31, 2024, at 21:36, arjun s <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> RHEL 8 or RHEL 9
> 

Reply via email to