Ah... I did read this issue wrongly. Yes, DD's
suggestion would be the only way to do this as <copy>
builds up a map (whose order is not guaranteed) to do
the copies. Using a separate copy operation for each
fileset would work. In Ant 1.7, you might add each
fileset to a <path> and use that for your copy source,
if you were just aching to do it all in one go.
HTH,
Matt
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 11:34 PM,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How about 3 copies instead? Guaranteed ordering
> ;-) --DD
> > I don't think that there is a guarantee of the
> order ...
>
> The way I read the problem, order within any given
> fileset was
> irrelevant, and each set should simply be copied in
> some order.
>
> As far as I know, tasks are still deterministically
> executed in the
> order they are listed! (unless in a <parallel> that
> is ;-) --DD
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
