Hi Gilbert,
at that time I found a workaround for my problem at
http://marc.info/?l=ant-user&m=123900769210029&w=2
If we look at the same sample script, so you have to open the log-file in the
first target, that is
executed and close it in the last target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project name="test" default="main" basedir=".">
<target name="main" depends="t1,t2">
<echo message="main-target" />
</target>
<target name="t1" depends="t2">
<echo message="I'm in t1 an call t3" />
<antcall target="t3" />
</target>
<target name="t2">
<record action="start" append="yes" name="test.log" />
<echo message="t2-target is executed" />
</target>
<target name="t3">
<echo message="t3-target is executed" />
<record action="stop" name="test.log" />
</target>
</project>
Now it works!
Hope that helps...
I don't know if it's a bug or feature.
Recently I was reading an article about announcing bugs in open source projects.
Many people criticize that bugs won't be fixed but scarcely anybody opens a
bug. So it can't be fixed.
On the other side it's important for me, that the community gives a feedback
about an issue, so you can be
sure not to put some bullshit in the bugtracker ...
Thanks,
Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gilbert Rebhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 21:48
An: Ant Users List; Ant Developers List
Betreff: ant 1.7.1 bug in <record> with antcall !?
Hi,
after (finally) upgrading from ant 1.6.5 to ant 1.7.1 a teammate
discovered some strange behaviour =
He makes heavy use of antcall and uses the <record> task.
Now with ant 1.7.1 there are a lot of 0 byte lines in the logs,
his editor jumps automatically in hexmode when opening
such a logfile.
Compared to ant 1.6.5 several parts of the logs are missing - probably
overwritten by those 0 byte lines.
Whether heavy use of antcall is good or bad style, that behaviour of
<record> task in ant 1.7.1 is _very annoying_, as important parts of the
logs are missing now after the upgrade.
There was already a similar posting on the ant user list =
http://marc.info/?l=ant-user&m=123900769210029&w=2
but got no repsone.
So, is that a known bug among other users|developers, didn't find a
record in the bug database ?
Maybe it's already patched in repository !?
Any suggestions or workarounds ??
Regards, Gilbert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
