On 2009-07-23, Nestor Dutko <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the explicit extract of the <path> declarations - as you can see
> <path id="ocm.jsse.classpath">
> <fileset dir="${ocm.dependencies.root}/ocm_common">
> <include name="jsse.jar"/>
> </fileset>
> </path>
> <path id="ocm.jsse-support.classpath">
> <fileset dir="${ocm.dependencies.root}/ocm_common">
> <include name="jcert.jar"/>
> <include name="jnet.jar"/>
> </fileset>
> </path>
> <path id="ocm.jce-support.classpath">
> <fileset dir="${ocm.dependencies.root}/ocm_collector">
> <include name="osdt_core3.jar"/>
> <include name="osdt_jce.jar"/>
> </fileset>
> </path>
These definitions are not causing the warning, the (or rather a) place
where you use refid="ocm.jsse.classpath" is.
> And all of the files include the common.xml as the first element
> within it using the ENTITY reference ('&common;')
> Its important to note that the <path> definitions reside OUTSIDE of
> a target. Is this the problem?
It shouldn't be, no. You may have hit a bug although I'm unbale to
reproduce it myself.
> On 2009-07-22, Nestor Dutko <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Trying to determine the cost of picking up ant 1.7.0, I tried this and found
>> now that I get the warning -
I'll note that Ant 1.7.1 is the current version and I don't have Ant
1.7.0 installed right now.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
