A wiki doesn't have to be publicly editable to be a wiki. Wikipedia may operate like that, but there are plenty of projects whose wikis are only editable by registered users. On Apr 15, 2012 6:32 PM, "Stephen L. De Rudder" <sld...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > The ant wiki isn't a wiki. It seems like most if not all the pages can not > be modified by anonymous contributers. Please don't call it a wiki if > people are not allowed to contribute. I wanted to add a page about the OS > condition tag, but I couldn't. The manual only goes into detail about the > <OS family="xxx"> stuff but ignores the name, arch, and version. It took me > a while but I found that those seem to be populated from the java > properties os.name, os.arch, and os.version. I think others could have > benifited from my research if your wiki was a wiki. SLDR(Stephen L. De > Rudder) I can't complain too much, the company I work for created a public > wiki too. They do allow paying maintence and support customers to request > access so they can contribute to the wiki (none to my knoledge have). After > enough complaining (mostly be me) we are about to remove the wiki and > rollout an expanded faq/blog site.
