HI JB,
I did see the JIRA thx. Let me know if I can be off help.

Also do you about this Aries BluePrint extension project and this
namespace:
http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-ext/v1.0.0

<http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-ext/v1.0.0>Thanks
Matt


On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> the JTA annotations are not yet supported by Aries JTA.
>
> I raised a Jira about that:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-628
>
> I plan to work on it in the following weeks.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/11/2011 04:56 PM, Matt Madhavan wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> We are using Aries Blueprint and OpenJPA 2.0. I'm investigating how to
>> mark my methods transactional using annotational!
>>
>>
>>
>> Going forward we would like to use Blueprint based annotations instead
>> of verbose xml files.
>>
>> I would like to annotate my class as follows:
>>
>> public class BlogPersistenceServiceImpl**implements BlogPersistenceService
>> {
>> *@PersistenceContext(unitName="blogExample")*
>> private EntityManager em;
>>
>> *@TransactionAttribute=Required *
>>      public void createAuthor(String email, Date dob, String name,
>> String displayName, String bio) {
>> AuthorImpl a = new AuthorImpl();
>>          ....
>>       }
>>
>> Is it possible to do @*TransactionAttribute *in Aries? Any help will be
>> appreciated!
>>
>> Currently my persistence service class is defined in blueprint.xml as
>> follows:
>>
>> <bean id="persistenceImpl"
>> class="com.xxxxx.jpa.dao.BlogPersistenceServiceImpl">
>> <tx:transaction method="*" value="Required" />
>> <jpa:context property="entityManager" unitname="blogExample" />
>> </bean>
>>
>> <service id="blogJPAPersistenceService" ref="persistenceImpl"
>> interface="com.xxxxx.jpa.api.persistence.BlogPersistenceService">
>> <service-properties>
>> <entry key="osgi.jndi.service.name <http://osgi.jndi.service.name>"
>>
>> value="persistence/bpJPAPersistenceService"/>
>> </service-properties>
>> </service>
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>> Matt
>>
>>

Reply via email to