Am Wednesday 29 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> The pom clearly "works" since we build the bundle correctly using it. I'm
> betting you are trying to use it in a way we didn't intend so can you
> provide information on what you are doing so we can look into it?

haha - nice one. Is there a document where the intended use is described?

The build for blueprint-bundle is broken, because the bundle doesn't contain 
all necessary dependencies and blueprint-bundle's pom doesn't list them.
After looking at DEPENDENCIES in META-INF and the output of dependency:tree 
I'm sure:

beat:blueprint-bundle olli$ mvn clean dependency:tree
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]                                                                         
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building Apache Aries Blueprint Bundle 0.3.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING] The POM for 
org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.impl:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT is 
invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug 
logging for more details
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.3:clean (default-clean) @ 
org.apache.aries.blueprint ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:tree (default-cli) @ 
org.apache.aries.blueprint ---
[WARNING] Invalid POM for 
org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.impl:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT, 
transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug logging 
for more details
[INFO] org.apache.aries.blueprint:org.apache.aries.blueprint:bundle:0.3.2-
SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.apache.aries.blueprint:org.apache.aries.blueprint.api:jar:0.3.2-
SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] +- 
org.apache.aries.blueprint:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:jar:0.3.2-
SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.aries.blueprint:blueprint-parser:jar:0.4-
SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.aries:org.apache.aries.util:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] |  \- org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.api:jar:0.4-
SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] +- org.apache.aries.blueprint:org.apache.aries.blueprint.cm:jar:0.3.2-
SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] +- org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT:test
[INFO] |  \- org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.impl:jar:0.4-
SNAPSHOT:test
[INFO] +- asm:asm-all:jar:3.2:test
[INFO] +- org.eclipse:osgi:jar:3.5.0.v20090520:provided
[INFO] +- org.osgi:org.osgi.compendium:jar:4.2.0:provided
[INFO] \- org.apache.aries.quiesce:org.apache.aries.quiesce.api:jar:0.3.1-
SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 19.515s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Jun 29 23:09:33 CEST 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 9M/1040M
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

I already gave you a link to the project where I use blueprint-bundle, see 
below.

> Alasdair Nottingham
> 
> On 28 Jun 2011, at 23:21, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote:
> > Am Wednesday 29 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> >> Alasdair Nottingham
> >> 
> >> On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:46, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote:
> >>> Am Tuesday 28 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> >>>> Alasdair Nottingham
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:06, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote:
> >>>>> Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> hey,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been
> >>>>>> more "on demand".
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release
> >>>>>> process so their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were
> >>>>>> previously. Some bundles might be at 0.4 and some at 0.3.1.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Do you need a release?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> a release with fixed dependencies would be nice. Instead of just
> >>>>> switching from org.apache.aries.blueprint 0.2-incubating to 0.3.1 I
> >>>>> had to add several missing dependencies (org.apache.aries.proxy,
> >>>>> org.apache.aries.util, org.objectweb.asm, org.objectweb.asm.commons,
> >>>>> org.objectweb.asm.tree).
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'm not sure I follow what you mean. I know 0.3 required more
> >>>> externals, this was a deliberate decision.
> >>> 
> >>> Looks like the manifest of blueprint is broken as it imports
> >>> org.apache.aries.proxy and org.apache.aries.util but the scope for
> >>> org.apache.aries.proxy in pom.xml is "test".
> >> 
> >> It isn't broken. The org.apache.aries.proxy import is for a package. The
> >> pom depends on modules or bundles. The org.apache.aries.proxy bundle
> >> contains the implementation of the proxy package and is only required to
> >> rub tests, not to compile the code.
> > 
> > For sure it's broken, otherwise I won't get this unresolved constraint
> > error:
> > 
> > [org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.internal.Activator] : Binding RemoteBundleContext
> > to RMI registry
> > [org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.internal.Activator] : Remote Bundle Context
> > started [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning
> > bundle [org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc]
> > [     RemoteBundleContextClient] - Remote bundle context found after 1849
> > millis
> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> > org.apache.aries.blueprint [10]: Unable to resolve 10.0: missing
> > requirement [10.0] package;
> > (&(package=org.apache.aries.proxy)(version>=0.3.0)(! (version>=1.0.0)))
> > 
> >    at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundle(Felix.java:3404)
> >    at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1714)
> >    at
> >    org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1143)
> >    at
> >    org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264
> >    ) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
> > 
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [org.springextensions.db4o]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [org.springframework.beans]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [org.springframework.core]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [org.springframework.transaction]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [com.db4o.java5]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [com.springsource.org.apache.tools.ant]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [com.springsource.javax.inject]
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [osgi.core] [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning
> > bundle [osgi.cmpn] ERROR: Error starting
> > file:bundles/org.apache.aries.blueprint_0.3.1.jar
> > (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> > org.apache.aries.blueprint [10]: Unable to resolve 10.0: missing
> > requirement [10.0] package;
> > (&(package=org.apache.aries.proxy)(version>=0.3.0)(! (version>=1.0.0))))
> > [org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher] : Scanning bundle
> > [org.apache.felix.configadmin]
> > 
> > Adding the mentioned deps to the pom fixed it.
> > 
> >>>> We aren't going to bundle dependencies
> >>>> into the bundles in the future. If you mean you want a zip that
> >>>> contains everything you need for blueprint or jpa
> >>> 
> >>> No, I just want a newer version of blueprint in my OSGi integration
> >>> tests
> >>> (https://src.springframework.org/svn/se-db4o/trunk/org.springextension
> >>> s.d b4o- it-osgi/pom.xml).
> >>> 
> >>>> we have discussed this and have
> >>>> support, we just haven't done a distribution release yet.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> O.

Reply via email to