Hi, The voting started but nobody except for me voted +1 so the release process didn't finish. It would help if you could leave a vote on the voting email at d...@aries.apache.org as well...
Cheers, David On 14 March 2017 at 09:17, Tom De Wolf <tom.dew...@aca-it.be> wrote: > David, > > We have seen that you did the release of the esa-maven-plugin 1.0.2. > However it is not yet available on https://mvnrepository.com/a > rtifact/org.apache.aries/esa-maven-plugin, any idea when it can be > expected there? > > Thanks, > > Tom > > Op ma 6 mrt. 2017 om 17:42 schreef Tom De Wolf <tom.dew...@aca-it.be>: > >> David, >> >> We tested our use cases and the current trunk version is working >> perfectly. Thanks for releasing it this week and letting us know when it is >> in maven central. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tom >> >> Op ma 6 mrt. 2017 om 15:16 schreef David Bosschaert < >> david.bosscha...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> I'd be happy to cut a release sometime this week - could you please >> double check that the current trunk version of the plugin works for you? >> >> Cheers, >> >> David >> >> On 6 March 2017 at 14:06, Tom De Wolf <tom.dew...@aca-it.be> wrote: >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for getting both pull requests merged into the esa-maven-plugin >> trunk. What are the next steps to get a release of it available on the >> central maven repository? When could we expect it so we can integrate it in >> our application builds? >> >> Thx >> >> Tom >> >> Op do 2 mrt. 2017 om 16:47 schreef David Bosschaert < >> david.bosscha...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> I can take a look at it sometime soon. >> >> Cheers, >> >> David >> >> On 2 March 2017 at 15:26, Tom De Wolf <tom.dew...@aca-it.be> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Who is maintainer of the esa-maven-plugin within the aries code base? We >> have a few pull requests we would like to get accepted and delivered in a >> new release: >> >> https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/69 for >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1490 >> >> and >> https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/63/ for https://issues. >> apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1650 >> >> As they both touch the same code it would be best to first merge pull >> request 69, then we can adapt pull request 63 and get that reviewed and >> merged. >> >> Any help would be much appreciated. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tom De Wolf >> >> >> >>
