Hi Madhan, thanks for the fast response.

I added the snippet of the application log that shows the stack trace when
I make the search request.
https://gist.github.com/connie-stripe/597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3#gistcomment-2277245

I also added as much of the application log as I could in another file
https://gist.github.com/connie-stripe/597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3#file-application-log

Let me know if that helps, thanks!

Connie

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Madhan Neethiraj <[email protected]> wrote:

> Connie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the details provided on this issue. Classification definition
> and basic-search REST API call details look good. To troubleshoot further,
> can you add complete application.log file?
>
>
>
> Madhan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Connie Chen <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 5:17 PM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *500 returns when I try to basic search
>
>
>
> Hi, I am new to using Atlas and I am testing out the API to create my data
> models. I've created a classification with a string attribute "dataType"
> where "isIndexable" is set to true. However, I cannot figure out how to
> query for a specific value via the API without getting a 500.
>
>
>
> Here is my configuration:
>
> https://gist.github.com/connie-stripe/597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3
>
>
>
> This is the field I am indexing on: https://gist.github.com/connie-stripe/
> 597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3#file-gistfile1-txt-L22
>
>
>
> Here is the curl command I am running to try and retrieve a value where
> that attribute field is a specific value: https://gist.github.
> com/connie-stripe/597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3#gistcomment-2277045
>
>
>
> Then I am getting these logs back: https://gist.github.com/connie-stripe/
> 597e087433869036e63e5d8363d61bd3#gistcomment-2277047
>
>
>
> Am I doing something wrong? Is there an easier way to debug these sorts of
> errors? The stack trace hasn't been very helpful. Thanks!
>
>
>
> Connie
>

Reply via email to