SpecificData#deepCopy will make this conversion. It currently fails
for enums, but the fix is easy. Here's a patch that makes that fix
and demonstrates a conversion. If this change is of interest, please
file an issue in Jira.
Doug
Index: lang/java/avro/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/generic/GenericData.java
===================================================================
--- lang/java/avro/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/generic/GenericData.java
(revision 1564561)
+++ lang/java/avro/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/generic/GenericData.java
(working copy)
@@ -933,8 +933,7 @@
case DOUBLE:
return (T)new Double((Double)value);
case ENUM:
- // Enums are immutable; shallow copy will suffice
- return value;
+ return (T)createEnum(value.toString(), schema);
case FIXED:
return (T)createFixed(null, ((GenericFixed) value).bytes(), schema);
case FLOAT:
Index:
lang/java/ipc/src/test/java/org/apache/avro/specific/TestSpecificData.java
===================================================================
--- lang/java/ipc/src/test/java/org/apache/avro/specific/TestSpecificData.java
(revision 1564561)
+++ lang/java/ipc/src/test/java/org/apache/avro/specific/TestSpecificData.java
(working copy)
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
import org.apache.avro.test.MD5;
import org.apache.avro.test.Kind;
+import org.apache.avro.generic.GenericRecord;
+
public class TestSpecificData {
@Test
@@ -95,6 +97,16 @@
new SpecificDatumReader<Object>());
}
+ @Test public void testConvertGenericToSpecific() {
+ GenericRecord generic = new GenericData.Record(TestRecord.SCHEMA$);
+ generic.put("name", "foo");
+ generic.put("kind", new GenericData.EnumSymbol(Kind.SCHEMA$, "BAR"));
+ generic.put("hash", new GenericData.Fixed
+ (MD5.SCHEMA$, new byte[]{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3,4,5}));
+ TestRecord specific =
+ (TestRecord)SpecificData.get().deepCopy(TestRecord.SCHEMA$, generic);
+ }
+
@Test public void testGetClassSchema() throws Exception {
Assert.assertEquals(TestRecord.getClassSchema(), TestRecord.SCHEMA$);
Assert.assertEquals(MD5.getClassSchema(), MD5.SCHEMA$);
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Christophe Taton
<christophe.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe we could eventually make a generic function that can rewrite any
> record or record builder, whether specific or generic, into another record
> or record builder, whether specific or generic.
>
> Until this happens, Mika's suggestion is probably the best short-term
> solution.
>
> C.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. When you say that we could write a generic
>> conversion function, do you mean we can write one that works for all
>> schemas? That would be great!
>>
>> I'd like an API something like this:
>>
>> MyCustomRecord record = MyCustomRecord.newBuilder(GenericRecord
>> record).build()
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Christophe Taton
>> <christophe.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Roger,
>>> With the change proposed in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1443, you would be able to create
>>> a specific record using a generic builder API. That means we could write a
>>> generic conversion function that creates specific records.
>>> Would that work for you?
>>> C.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working with an existing API that hands me a GenericRecord. Is
>>>> there an easy way I can covert it into a SpecificRecord. Really I want to
>>>> get it into the code-generated object.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Roger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
