I left a few comments, but overall this sounds like a good plan to me -
thanks for the writeup!

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:36 AM Anand Inguva via dev <d...@beam.apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I created a doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xmh9D_904H-6X19Mi0-tDACwCCMvP4_MFA9QT0TOym8/edit#>[1]
> which outlines the plan for the RunInference API[2] benchmark/performance
> tests. I would appreciate feedback on the following,
>
>    - Models used for the benchmark tests.
>    - Metrics calculated as part of the benchmark tests.
>
>
> If you have any inputs or any suggestions on additional metrics/models
> that would be helpful for the Beam ML community as part of the benchmark
> tests, please let us know.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xmh9D_904H-6X19Mi0-tDACwCCMvP4_MFA9QT0TOym8/edit#
> [2]
>  
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/67cb87ecc2d01b88f8620ed6821bcf71376d9849/sdks/python/apache_beam/ml/inference/base.py#L269
> <https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/67cb87ecc2d01b88f8620ed6821bcf71376d9849/sdks/python/apache_beam/ml/inference/base.py#L269>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Anand
>

Reply via email to