ProcessEvents receive as an input a Session object and créate a KV<long,
SharedCoreEvent> as an output

El El jue, 4 de abr de 2024 a la(s) 8:52 p.m., Reuven Lax via user <
user@beam.apache.org> escribió:

> There are some sharp edges unfortunately around auto-inference of KV
> coders and schemas. Is there a previous PCollection of type
> SharedCoreEvent, or is the SharedCoreEvent created in ProcessEvents?
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:12 PM Ruben Vargas <ruben.var...@metova.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello guys
>>
>> I have a question, is it possible to use KV along with AutoValueSchema
>> objects? I'm having troubles when I try to use it together.
>>
>> I have an object like the following
>>
>> @AutoValue
>> @DefaultSchema(AutoValueSchema.class)
>> public abstract class SharedCoreEvent {
>>
>> @JsonProperty("subscriptionId")
>> public abstract String getSubscription();
>>
>> <other properties>
>> }
>>
>> Then I have a pipeline like the following:
>>
>>  input.apply(ParDo.of(new ProcessEvents()))
>>         .apply(Reshuffle.of()).apply(Values.create()).apply(output);
>>
>> My input is a single object and my ProcessEvents will produce tons of
>> events, in a fan-out fashion. that is why I used Reshuffle here
>>
>> But when I run this pipeline it throws the following error:
>>
>> lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to return a default Coder for
>> MCEvents/ParDo(ProcessEvents)/ParMultiDo(ProcessEvents).output
>> [PCollection@2131266396]. Correct one of the following root causes:
>>   No Coder has been manually specified;  you may do so using .setCoder().
>>
>>   Inferring a Coder from the CoderRegistry failed: Cannot provide
>> coder for parameterized type
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.values.KV<java.lang.Long, events.SharedCoreEvent>:
>> Unable to provide a Coder for events.SharedCoreEvent
>>   Building a Coder using a registered CoderProvider failed.
>>
>>
>> Something similar happens with my source when I use KafkaIO and the
>> source produces a KV<String,Session>  PCollection.
>>
>> Is there any reason for this? Maybe I'm misusing the schemas?
>>
>> Really appreciate your help
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ruben
>>
>

Reply via email to