On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Oh, thanks Frances.
>
> I mixed DirectPipelineRunner ("old" local runner), and
> InProcessPipelineRunner ("new" local runner) ;)
>
> We should remove the DirectPipelineRunner to avoid confusion. WDYT ?
>

We would like to do this soon, but there are some snags.

As a preparation step, Thomas swapped the default runner from Direct to
InProcess. (#178 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/178>)

However, testing unfortunately exposed some issues with the InProcess
runner. (Actually, I should say "fortunately" because the tests caught it!
Yay!) So we had to roll it back. (#198
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/198>)

Once we improve the InProcess runner, we can re-do the default swap. After
the swap, once the tests keep passing for a few days, we do indeed intend
to delete the current Direct pipeline runner and replace it with the
current InProcess runner.

Dan


>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/02/2016 03:12 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>
>> +Thomas, author of the InProcessPipelineRunner
>>
>> The DirectPipelineRunner doesn't yet support unbounded PCollections. You
>> can try using the InProcessPipelineRunner, which is the re-write of
>> local execution that provides support for unbounded PCollections and
>> better checking against the Beam Model. (We'll be renaming this to the
>> DirectPipelineRunner in the near future to avoid having both as soon as
>> the functionality of the InProcessPipelineRunner is complete.)
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 4:38 PM, amir bahmanyari <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi JB,
>>     I rebuilt my code with the latest :
>>     kafka-0.1.0-incubating-20160501.070733-11.jar
>>     <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/beam/kafka/0.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/kafka-0.1.0-incubating-20160501.070733-11.jar
>> >
>>     java-sdk-all-0.1.0-incubating-20160501.070453-25.jar
>>     <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/beam/java-sdk-all/0.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/java-sdk-all-0.1.0-incubating-20160501.070453-25.jar
>> >
>>
>>
>>     Tried _without setting withMaxNumRecords()_:
>>     Throws java.lang.IllegalStateException: no evaluator registered for
>>     Read(UnboundedKafkaSource)
>>     at
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.DirectPipelineRunner$Evaluator.visitTransform(DirectPipelineRunner.java:898)
>>     at
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformTreeNode.visit(TransformTreeNode.java:221)
>>     at
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformTreeNode.visit(TransformTreeNode.java:217)
>>
>>     _With setting ithMaxNumRecords(_), I see the thread is running, no
>>     exceptions like above, waiting for incoming Kafka data, but the
>>     method obtaining the data from processElement(ProcessContext ctx)
>>     never executes.
>>     Therefore, nothing goes into apply(TextIO.Write.to
>>     <http://TextIO.Write.to>("c:\\temp\\KafkaOut\\Kafkadata.txt")).
>>
>>     I see Kafka Broker reports my laptop IP address as getting a
>>     connection to it, OK.
>>     Everything looks OK at the server side.
>>     Doesn't look like its my lucky day.
>>     I appreciate any help/feedback/suggetion.
>>     Cheers
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     *From:* Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>> >>
>>     *To:* [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     *Sent:* Friday, April 29, 2016 10:36 PM
>>     *Subject:* Re: KafkaIO Usage & Sample Code
>>
>>
>>     As I said in my previous e-mail, until recently DirectPipelineRunner
>>     didn't support Unbounded.
>>
>>     It's now fixed, so if you take a latest nightly build, or build
>> master,
>>     it should work.
>>
>>     As workaround, you can also limit the number of message consumed from
>>     Kafka (and so work with bounded).
>>
>>     Regards
>>     JB
>>
>>     On 04/29/2016 07:12 PM, amir bahmanyari wrote:
>>      > Hi colleagues,
>>      > I am moving this conversation to this users mailing list as per
>> Max’s
>>      > suggestion.
>>      > Thanks Max.
>>      > Hi JB,
>>      > Hope all is great.
>>      > Is there a resolution to the exception I sent last night pls?
>>      > When would the sample code to use KafkaIO be released?
>>      > I really appreciate your valuable time. Below is the exception
>>     for your
>>      > reference.
>>      > This is how it gets used in my code:
>>      >
>>      >
>>
>> p.apply(KafkaIO.read().withBootstrapServers("kirk:9092").withTopics(topics));
>>      >
>>      > Have a wonderful weekend.
>>      > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: no
>>     evaluator
>>      > registered for Read(UnboundedKafkaSource)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.DirectPipelineRunner$Evaluator.visitTransform(DirectPipelineRunner.java:898)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformTreeNode.visit(TransformTreeNode.java:221)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformTreeNode.visit(TransformTreeNode.java:217)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformTreeNode.visit(TransformTreeNode.java:217)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.TransformHierarchy.visit(TransformHierarchy.java:104)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.traverseTopologically(Pipeline.java:261)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.DirectPipelineRunner$Evaluator.run(DirectPipelineRunner.java:860)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.DirectPipelineRunner.run(DirectPipelineRunner.java:572)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.runners.DirectPipelineRunner.run(DirectPipelineRunner.java:106)
>>      >        at org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.run(Pipeline.java:182)
>>      >        at
>>      >
>>
>> benchmark.flinkspark.flink.ReadFromKafka2.main(ReadFromKafka2.java:286)
>>      > Kind Regards,
>>      > Amir
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     http://blog.nanthrax.net <http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>     Talend - http://www.talend.com <http://www.talend.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to