DWR pratically enables javascript-based Controller tier, thus breaking the necessity of beehive pageflow.
I would suggest another approach for Beehuve: using a combination of Rico( http://openrico.org/rico/home.page) and http://glm-ajax.sourceforge.net/ I have personally used them in a conference demo for Beehive pageflow quite successfully :-) 2005/10/21, Aaron Oathout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > We have used DWR on weblogic 9.0. Worth taking a look at > > On 10/20/05, Kevin Conaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've had success using DWR with WebLogic 8.1 SP2 > > > > DWR > > http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/ > > > > Kevin > > > > On 10/20/05, James Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Daryl Olander wrote: > > > > There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to > Beehive. > > > I'm > > > > beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to > > > Beehive. > > > > I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For > > > example, > > > > should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client > and > > > > integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions? > Should > > > > Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What > frameworks > > > seem > > > > to work best in the "real world"? > > > > > > I have a webapp that uses controls, pageflow and webservices, all > > > using beehive. > > > > > > For one part of it, at least, I would like to use ajax. I wouldn't > > > care if an existing framework is used, as long as everything can work > > > together. > > > > > > I have been playing with Echo2, but I don't know if that would be > > > useful, and laszlo would be a bad choice, since it converts to flash. > > > > > > I would just expect that if I have ajax enabled pages that they can > > > work smoothly with the non-ajax pages in my webapp. > > > > > > - -- > > > "Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen > > > James Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > > > iD8DBQFDV+BzikQgpVn8xrARAsMZAJsH0wgzWgdLl/XY0oaI55ZDH8PNbwCgiuuG > > > zTa/fvQIjGRsK+3G3CrO/HE= > > > =7YVI > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Antony Chien
