i can't wait to get back to the world of java programming/design & developement
i've been lost in the "netherworlds" of movie stars and world politcs and how i am getting sooooooo annnoooyyyeeeddd gotta start looking out for myself have a nice day - perry On 6/20/06, Chad Schoettger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremiah, It appears that this is a bug in the code. The control checker used to validate JDBC control annotation values is enforcing that arrayMaxLength > 0 , but the runtime code is fine with that value and in that particular case will cause the array size to be unlimited. Go ahead a file a JIRA bug on this issue and I'll start looking at a fix. - Chad On 6/19/06, Jeremiah Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a DB Control that returns an array; the default number max rows > is 1024, but I don't want to limit the rows on this call. I can't > change arrayMaxLength to zero, so I have to use a magic number in the > annotation (i.e. arrayMaxLength=300000). > > I can put in an enhancement request, but I wonder if there is something > that I am missing about requiring the arrayMaxLength to be greater than > zero. Is there a reason for the current constraint? > > Thank you. > > - jeremiah > _______________________________________________________________________ > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, > and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > by email and then delete it. >
-- Perry Anderson ---------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (250)724-4560 day (250)723-6511 evening (250)724-4565 fax ----------------------------------------
