More the latter, but if you find anything that can be demonstrated with a failing unit test, that is more than appreciated.
Matt On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Jesus Mireles <[email protected]> wrote: > Is the need on Unit Tests or using it and reporting back on any issues > found? > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Jesus, >> Timeline is not so certain. There are a couple of us working on it as >> time permits. I'd say no less than 2 months. The 1.1 branch will *not* >> function properly with a SecurityManager at present, but we believe the >> basic functionality in support of the BV 1.1 spec to be complete, or very >> nearly so. if you or any other member of the community is able to test it >> out that can only speed up the process. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >> >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Jesus Mireles <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I was wondering what the community has planned for the 1.1.x release. I >>> found the bval-11 branch on github and I found it is still in Alpha. Are >>> there plans to take it to Beta or RC and if so does anyone have a >>> timeline >>> for that? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jesus M. >>> >> >> >
