Looking at db/SystemTable.java I see the use of Bootstrap as a token
during bootstrap, but it seems to be for the system table, not other
keyspaces.  Is it used more generally than that or is this a bug?

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Benjamin Black <b...@b3k.us> wrote:
> As part of my continuous abuse of a small cluster for Chef cookbook
> development, I've run across a strange issue I'm hoping someone can
> explain.  The following is output after upgrading from beta2 to beta3
> and running nodetool rebalance on .140.224:
>
> Address       Status     Load          Range
>           Ring
>                                       HS3ltoTahEIsK65e
> 10.177.144.176Up         5.41 KB       B61cmDQkiI92SoCu
>           |<--|
> 10.177.140.224Up         2.33 KB       Bootstrap
>           |   |
> 10.177.138.136Up         6.13 KB       HS3ltoTahEIsK65e
>           |-->|
>
> From the logs:
>
>  INFO [STREAM-STAGE:1] 2010-03-22 03:16:28,586 StreamOut.java (line
> 66) Sending a stream initiate message to /10.177.138.136 ...
>  INFO [RMI TCP Connection(6)-173.203.205.232] 2010-03-22 03:16:30,596
> StorageLoadBalancer.java (line 365) Sleeping 90000 ms to wait for load
> information...
>  INFO [RMI TCP Connection(6)-173.203.205.232] 2010-03-22 03:18:00,616
> BootStrapper.java (line 104) New token will be Bootstrap to assume
> load from /10.177.138.136
>  INFO [RMI TCP Connection(6)-173.203.205.232] 2010-03-22 03:18:00,616
> StorageService.java (line 1430) re-bootstrapping to new token
> Bootstrap
>  INFO [RMI TCP Connection(6)-173.203.205.232] 2010-03-22 03:18:00,616
> StorageService.java (line 376) Joining: sleeping 30000 for pending
> range setup
>  INFO [RMI TCP Connection(6)-173.203.205.232] 2010-03-22 03:18:30,626
> StorageService.java (line 376) Bootstrapping
>  INFO [MESSAGE-DESERIALIZER-POOL:1] 2010-03-22 03:18:30,656
> StorageService.java (line 180) Bootstrap/move completed! Now serving
> reads.
>
>
> Although it is possible the range 'Bootstrap' was randomly generated,
> it seems more likely it has somehow been assigned explicitly.  Can
> someone illuminate what is going on here?
>
>
> b
>

Reply via email to