i also noticed "unknown result" errors when my php thrift code was
generated using a different version of thrift than cassandra uses.

after regenerating my php code from thrift-r917130 (for
cassandra-0.6.0-rc1), the errors stopped.

-keith

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:40 AM, vineet daniel <vineetdan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> can you post the code
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Lee Parker <l...@socialagency.com> wrote:
>>
>> According to his docs, he says you need Cassandra >= 0.5.0.  I guess it is
>> possible that the included thrift files are targeted at 0.6, but I don't see
>> the "batch_mutate" method which is part of 0.6.  So I'm assuming that it
>> should work fine with 0.5.0.
>> I have now changed some of those entries in the configs and I have not
>> seen the error in a while.  So, it may have simply been that I was trying to
>> do a query which was too large for the configured buffer to handle.
>> For the time being, I would like to stick with 0.5 as it is the "stable"
>> release and we are running this in a production environment.
>>
>> Lee Parker
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pandra is probably targetting 0.6.
>>>
>>> If you're just starting, there's no reason for you not to use 0.6 over
>>> 0.5 now.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Lee Parker <l...@socialagency.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I'm using the thrift client which is packaged with Pandra and my
>>> > cassandra
>>> > version is 0.5.0 which is in the debian packages.  How can i tell which
>>> > version of Thrift i'm using?
>>> > Lee
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Then you're probably using a client incompatible with the server
>>> >> version you're using.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Lee Parker <l...@socialagency.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > If the connections are being made by individual PHP processes
>>> >> > running
>>> >> > from
>>> >> > the command line, they shouldn't be using the same connection.
>>> >> >  Should
>>> >> > my
>>> >> > code close the connections after each query and open a new one?
>>> >> > Here is the flow of what is happening when we get the error:
>>> >> > 1. Get a set of items from remote API
>>> >> > 2. Insert all of the items into the items CF. (usually anywhere from
>>> >> > 2 -
>>> >> > 200
>>> >> > items)
>>> >> > 3. Query the correct index for all entries within a particular time
>>> >> > frame
>>> >> > (which is determined by the timeframe of the results of step 1)
>>> >> > 4. Compare keys in index to keys of items inserted in step 2.
>>> >> > 5. Insert new index columns for items which aren't already in the
>>> >> > index.
>>> >> > I am getting the "unknown result" error during step 3.
>>> >> > Lee
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> unknown result means thrift is badly confused.  You will get this
>>> >> >> when
>>> >> >> using the same thrift connection from multiple threads, for
>>> >> >> instance.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Lee Parker <l...@socialagency.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> > I am a newbie with Cassandra.  We are currently migrating a large
>>> >> >> > amount
>>> >> >> > of
>>> >> >> > data out of MySQL into Cassandra.  I have two ColumnFamilies.
>>> >> >> >  One
>>> >> >> > contains
>>> >> >> > one row per item and each item has roughly 12 columns.  These are
>>> >> >> > items
>>> >> >> > from
>>> >> >> > REST APIs like the Twitter API.  Then I have a second
>>> >> >> > ColumnFamily
>>> >> >> > with
>>> >> >> > very
>>> >> >> > large rows and TimeUUID column names which contain the key of the
>>> >> >> > items
>>> >> >> > in
>>> >> >> > the other ColumnFamily.  So one ColumnFamily has lots of rows
>>> >> >> > with a
>>> >> >> > low
>>> >> >> > number of columns per row, and the other has relatively few rows
>>> >> >> > with
>>> >> >> > a
>>> >> >> > large (~500k) columns per row.
>>> >> >> > I am getting rather frequent errors with "unknown result" from
>>> >> >> > get_slice
>>> >> >> > and
>>> >> >> > multiget_slice calls from the index ColumnFamily.  I am using
>>> >> >> > Pandra
>>> >> >> > for
>>> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> > calls.  I can see that this is a generic exception thrown by the
>>> >> >> > Cassandra
>>> >> >> > Thrift package when it doesn't know what else to say.  Is there a
>>> >> >> > way
>>> >> >> > to
>>> >> >> > actually see what the result was in a more raw form from the
>>> >> >> > Thrift
>>> >> >> > protocol?
>>> >> >> > One thought I had on why this is happening is that my results
>>> >> >> > might
>>> >> >> > be
>>> >> >> > larger than the configuration settings.  Does anyone have any
>>> >> >> > good
>>> >> >> > ideas
>>> >> >> > on
>>> >> >> > how to calculate what the ideal values of SlicedBufferSizeInKB
>>> >> >> > and ColumnIndexSizeInKB should be?  If these are too low, would i
>>> >> >> > get
>>> >> >> > a
>>> >> >> > more
>>> >> >> > descriptive error?
>>> >> >> > Lee Parker
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to