I would disagree with that assessment. My take is that Voltdb is a
high throughput, fault tolerant transaction processing db as opposed
to a caching system or key value store. It's easy to get hung up on
the in-memory nature of it but I believe that it is both fault
tolerant through redundant copies of the data and fully acid compliant.
--
Thanks,
Charles Woerner
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:09 PM, AJ Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
Its proper competitors are stuff like redis and memcached.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jones, Nick <[email protected]>
wrote:
I saw a tweet about claiming far better performance to Cassandra.
After following up, I found out it requires the entire DB to reside
in memory across the nodes.
Nick Jones
From: Denis Haskin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:17 AM
To: user
Subject: http://voltdb.com/ ?
Anybody looked at VoltDB? I haven't dug into it, but curious about
it.
dwh
