This is a cluster which is horribly imbalanced because I didn't assign
initial tokens, so I'm adding 6 nodes with tokens according to the operations
page (ie, i * (2^127/N) with N = 6).
So here's what the ring will look like when bootstrap finishes
151901684708361811491018697633480111658
Old 1 673.76 GB 1620761242680682425026573496599110901
Old 2 204.90 GB 10637639655367601517656788464652024082
Old 3 139.82 GB 21604748163853165203168832909938143241
New 1 28356863910078205288614550619314017621
Old 4 250.61 GB 46182405069378676149148922496055212595
New 2 56713727820156410577229101238628035242
New 3 85070591730234615865843651857942052863
Old 5 572.91 GB 103509928471922053310251250943275708086
New 4 113427455640312821154458202477256070485
New 5 141784319550391026443072753096570088106
Old 6 739.61 GB 151901684708361811491018697633480111658
New 6 170141183460469231731687303715884105728
So from this it seems like I should see anti-compacition on old nodes
4, 5, 6 and 1.
Looking now, it seem that 1 and 6 have had some anti-compaction
happen, node 4 has
INFO [STREAM-STAGE:1] 2010-07-14 20:53:26,579 StreamOut.java (line 95)
Performing anticompaction ...
in the log but not a corresponding
CompactionManager.java (line 339) AntiCompacting [..]
line
Node 5 has nothing in its logs about anti-compaction.
Is the fact that 2 new nodes are in the range messing it up? And if so
how do I recover (I'm thinking, shutdown new nodes 2,3,4,5, the bringing
up nodes 2,4, waiting for them to finish, then bringing up 3,5?).
-Anthony
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:45:45PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Each node logs what token it is going to bootstrap to. Who owns the
> ranges that contain those tokens?
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a 0.6.3 cluster which contains 6 nodes. I added 6 new nodes
> > by setting AutoBootstrap to true and setting an InitialToken on each new
> > node, then waiting for the "Bootstrapping" message in the log before
> > starting another. Then I've been watching the logs on the old boxes
> > waiting to see AntiCompaction messages.
> >
> > Unfortunately after several hours I only see 1 of the 6 old nodes has
> > the AntiCompaction message. The new nodes are placed such that every
> > old node should have some data pulled from it. Why don't I see more
> > Anti Compaction messages? Are there other things I should be looking
> > at?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Anthony
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Anthony Molinaro <[email protected]>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
> http://riptano.com
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Molinaro <[email protected]>
