thats not exactly what im seeing, is not a row, but columns on a row that i was deleting
ie: suppose i have a row where the key is sec_index_1 where i have two columns with information about other row keys sec_index_1 { key1:key1, key2:key2 } then i add a deletion for the column named key2, run it through batch mutate for the key sec_index_1 then i load the row again to see all my "references" stored in columns, and im still getting key1, key2 Nicolas Santini On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tyler Hobbs <ty...@riptano.com> wrote: > There's no problem doing deletions with batch_mutate, but you are probably > seeing this: > > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#range_ghosts > > - Tyler > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Nick Santini <nick.sant...@kaseya.com>wrote: > >> since the 0.7beta2 version doesnt support indexes for Super CF or for >> columns that you might not now the name yet, im supporting them manually by >> adding a row on the same CF where the key is the name of the column plus the >> value, and in the columns hold the key to the referenced rows >> >> this works as in i can actually find my rows using the secondary index >> rows >> >> but when i try to delete the original row i want to update my secondary >> indexs, so i create a mutation map in the same way i did it when i saved my >> information, but this time it only contains deletions for those secondary >> indexs rows and only for the column referencing to the row being deleted. >> but this doesnt seem to work, it comes back successfully (no erros), but >> im still able to find the references to the deleted row in those secondary >> indexes >> >> is there any issue trying to run a batch_mutate with only deletions? >> >> thanks >> >> Nicolas Santini >> >> >