On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> > It should work fine; the main reason to go with local storage is the > > huge cost advantage. > > [OT] They're quoting roughly the same price for both (claiming that the > extra cost goes into having for each node a separate disk cabinet to run > local raid-5). > You might not need raid-5 for local attached storage. Refer [1] for more information. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraHardware > > > *I just committed a README for contrib/stress to the 0.7 svn branch > > thanks! i'll check it out. > > ~mck > > -- > “An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has > come.” - Victor Hugo > | www.semb.wever.org | www.sesat.no > | www.finn.no | http://xss-http-filter.sf.net >
