Thanks!

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:40 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote:

> Ah, I see the case you are talking about.
>
> If the node will auto bootstrap on startup if when it joins the ring: it is
> not already bootstrapped, auto bootstrap is enabled, and the node is not in
> it's own seed list.
>
> In the auto bootstrap process then finds the token it wants, but aborts the
> process if there are no non system tables defined.That may happen because
> the bootstrap code finds the node with the highest load and splits it's
> range, if all the nodes have zero load (no user data) then that process is
> unreliable. But it's also unreliable if there is a schema and no data.
>
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2625 to see if it
> can be changed.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----------------
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
> On 7 May 2011, at 05:25, Len Bucchino wrote:
>
> While I agree that what you suggested is a very good idea the bootstrapping
> process _*should*_ work properly.
>
> Here is some additional detail on the original problem.  If the current
> node that you are trying to bootstrap has itself listed in seeds in its yaml
> then it will be able to bootstrap on an empty schema.  If it does not have
> itself listed in seeds in its yaml and you have and empty schema then the
> bootstrap process will not complete and no errors will be reported in the
> logs even with debug enabled.
>
> *From:* aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:51 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: New node not joining
>
> When adding nodes it is a *very* good idea to manually set the tokens, see
> http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations#Load_balancing
>
> bootstrap is a process that happens only once on a node, where as well as
> telling the other nodes it's around it asks them to stream over the data it
> will no be responsible for.
>
> nodetool loadbalance is an old utility that should have better warnings not
> to use it. The best way to load balance the cluster is manually creating the
> tokens and assigning them either using the initial_token config param or
> using nodetool move.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -----------------
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
> On 6 May 2011, at 08:37, Sanjeev Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> Here is what I did.
> I booted up the first one. After that I started the second one with
> bootstrap turned off.
> Then I did a nodetool loadbalance on the second node.
> After which I added the third node again with bootstrap turned off. Then
> did the loadbalance again on the third node.
> This seems to have successfully completed and I am now able to read/write
> into my system.
>
> Thanks!
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Len Bucchino <len.bucch...@veritix.com>
> wrote:
> I just rebuilt the cluster in the same manner as I did originally except
> after I setup the first node I added a keyspace and column family before
> adding any new nodes.  This time the 3rd node auto bootstrapped
> successfully.
>
> *From:* Len Bucchino [mailto:len.bucch...@veritix.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:31 PM
>
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: New node not joining
>
>
> Also, setting auto_bootstrap to false and setting token to the one that it
> said it would use in the logs allows the new node to join the ring.
>
> *From:* Len Bucchino [mailto:len.bucch...@veritix.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:25 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: New node not joining
>
> Adding the fourth node to the cluster with an empty schema using
> auto_bootstrap was not successful.  A nodetool netstats on the new node
> shows “Mode: Joining: getting bootstrap token” similar to what the third
> node did before it was manually added.  Also, there are no exceptions in the
> logs but it never joins the ring.
>
> *From:* Sanjeev Kulkarni [mailto:sanj...@locomatix.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 11:47 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: New node not joining
>
> Hi Len,
> This looks like a decent workaround. I would be very interested to see how
> the addition of the 4th node went. Please post it whenever you get a chance.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Len Bucchino <len.bucch...@veritix.com>
> wrote:
> I have the same problem on 0.7.5 auto bootstrapping a 3rd node onto an
> empty 2 node test cluster (the two nodes were manually added) and the it
> currently has an empty schema.  My log entries look similar to yours.  I
> took the new token it says its going to use from the log file added it to
> the yaml and turned off auto bootstrap and the node added fine.  I'm
> bringing up a 4th node now and will see if it has the same problem auto
> bootstrapping.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Sanjeev Kulkarni [sanj...@locomatix.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:18 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* New node not joining
> Hey guys,
> I'm running into what seems like a very basic problem.
> I have a one node cassandra instance. Version 0.7.5. Freshly installed.
> Contains no data.
> The cassandra.yaml is the same as the default one that is supplied, except
> for data/commitlog/saved_caches directories.
> I also changed the addresses to point to a externally visible ip address.
> The cassandra comes up nicely and is ready to accept thrift connections.
> I do a nodetool and this is what I get.
>
> 10.242.217.124  Up     Normal  6.54 KB         100.00%
> 110022862993086789903543147927259579701
>
> Which seems right to me.
>
> Now I start another node. Almost identical configuration to the first one.
> Except the bootstrap is turned true and seeds appropriately set.
> When I start the second, I notice that the second one contacts the first
> node to get the new token.
> I see the following lines in the first machine(the seed machine).
>
> INFO [GossipStage:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:20,427 Gossiper.java (line 628) Node
> /10.83.111.80 has restarted,
> now UP again
>  INFO [HintedHandoff:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:55,162 HintedHandOffManager.java
> (line 304) Started hinted handoff for endpoint /10.83.111.80
>  INFO [HintedHandoff:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:55,164 HintedHandOffManager.java
> (line 360) Finished hinted hand
> off of 0 rows to endpoint /10.83.111.80
>
> However when i do a node ring, I still get
>
> 10.242.217.124  Up     Normal  6.54 KB         100.00%
> 110022862993086789903543147927259579701
>
> Even though the second node has come up. On the second machine the logs say
>
> INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:00:19,124 StorageService.java (line 504) Joining:
> getting load information
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:00:19,124 StorageLoadBalancer.java (line 351)
> Sleeping 90000 ms to wait for load information...
>  INFO [GossipStage:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:20,828 Gossiper.java (line 628) Node
> /10.242.217.124 has restarted, now UP again
>  INFO [HintedHandoff:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:29,548 HintedHandOffManager.java
> (line 304) Started hinted handoff for endpoint /10.242.217.124
>  INFO [HintedHandoff:1] 2011-05-05 07:00:29,550 HintedHandOffManager.java
> (line 360) Finished hinted handoff of 0 rows to endpoint /10.242.217.124
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,137 StorageService.java (line 504)
> Joining: getting bootstrap token
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,148 BootStrapper.java (line 148) New token
> will be 24952271262852174037699496069317526837 to assume load from /
> 10.242.217.124
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,150 Mx4jTool.java (line 72) Will not load
> MX4J, mx4j-tools.jar is not in the classpath
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,259 CassandraDaemon.java (line 112)
> Binding thrift service to /10.83.111.80:9160
>  INFO [main] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,262 CassandraDaemon.java (line 126) Using
> TFastFramedTransport with a max frame size of 15728640 bytes.
>  INFO [Thread-5] 2011-05-05 07:01:49,266 CassandraDaemon.java (line 154)
> Listening for thrift clients...
>
> This seems to indicate that the second node has joined the ring. And has
> gotten its key range.
> Am I missing anything?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to