Hi,

On my computer with 2G RAM and a core 2 duo CPU E4600 @ 2.40GHz, I am testing 
the 
performance of Cassandra. The write performance is good: It can write a million 
records 
in 10 minutes. However, the query performance is poor and it takes 10 minutes 
to read 
10K records with sequential keys from 0 to 9999 (about 100 QPS). This is far 
away from 
the 3,xxx QPS found on the net.

Cassandra decided to use 1G as the Java heap size which seems to be fine as at 
the end
of the benchmark the swap was barely used (only 1M used).

I understand that my computer may be not as powerful as those used in the 
other benchmarks, 
but it shouldn't be that far off (1:30), right?

Any suggestion? Thanks in advance!

Reply via email to