>>>It's very surprising that no one seems to have solved such a common use
case.
I would say people have solved it using RIGHT tools for the task.



On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Drew Kutcharian <d...@venarc.com> wrote:

> Thanks everyone for the replies. Seems like there is no easy way to handle
> this. It's very surprising that no one seems to have solved such a common
> use case.
>
> -- Drew
>
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Bryce Allen wrote:
>
> > That's a good question, and I'm not sure - I'm fairly new to both ZK
> > and Cassandra. I found this wiki page:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/FailureScenarios
> > and I think the lock recipe still works, even if a stale read happens.
> > Assuming that wiki page is correct.
> >
> > There is still subtlety to locking with ZK though, see (Locks based
> > on ephemeral nodes) from the zk mailing list in October:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-user/201110.mbox/thread?0
> >
> > -Bryce
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:36:52 -0800
> > Drew Kutcharian <d...@venarc.com> wrote:
> >> Bryce,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure about ZooKeeper, but I know if you have a partition
> >> between HazelCast nodes, than the nodes can acquire the same lock
> >> independently in each divided partition. How does ZooKeeper handle
> >> this situation?
> >>
> >> -- Drew
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 6, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Bryce Allen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:03:38 -0800
> >>> Drew Kutcharian <d...@venarc.com> wrote:
> >>>> I know that this can be done using a lock manager such as ZooKeeper
> >>>> or HazelCast, but the issue with using either of them is that if
> >>>> ZooKeeper or HazelCast is down, then you can't be sure about the
> >>>> reliability of the lock. So this potentially, in the very rare
> >>>> instance where the lock manager is down and two users are
> >>>> registering with the same email, can cause major issues.
> >>>
> >>> For most applications, if the lock managers is down, you don't
> >>> acquire the lock, so you don't enter the critical section. Rather
> >>> than allowing inconsistency, you become unavailable (at least to
> >>> writes that require a lock).
> >>>
> >>> -Bryce
> >>
>
>


-- 
Narendra Sharma
Software Engineer
*http://www.aeris.com <http://www.persistentsys.com>*
*http://narendrasharma.blogspot.com/*

Reply via email to