Hi Florent,

I don't change the server version, it is the Cassandra 0.8.10. I
change just the version of cassandra-all in pom.xml of the mapreduce
job.

I have the 'rpc_address: 0.0.0.0'  in cassandra.yaml, because I want
cassandra to bind RPC to all interfaces.

Regards,
P.

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 09:44, Florent Lefillâtre <flefi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I had the same problem on hadoop 0.20.2 and cassandra 1.0.5.
> In my case the split of token range failed.
> I have comment line 'rpc_address: 0.0.0.0' in cassandra.yaml.
> May be see if you have not configuration changes between 0.8.7 and 0.8.10
>
>
> Le 6 mars 2012 09:32, Patrik Modesto <patrik.mode...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was recently trying Hadoop job + cassandra-all 0.8.10 again and the
>> Timeouts I get are not because of the Cassandra can't handle the
>> requests. I've noticed there are several tasks that show proggess of
>> several thousands percents. Seems like they are looping their range of
>> keys. I've run the job with debug enabled and the ranges look ok, see
>> http://pastebin.com/stVsFzLM
>>
>> Another difference between cassandra-all 0.8.7 and 0.8.10 is the
>> number of mappers the job creates:
>> 0.8.7: 4680
>> 0.8.10: 595
>>
>> Task       Complete
>> task_201202281457_2027_m_000041 9076.81%
>> task_201202281457_2027_m_000073 9639.04%
>> task_201202281457_2027_m_000105 10538.60%
>> task_201202281457_2027_m_000108 9364.17%
>>
>> None of this happens with cassandra-all 0.8.7.
>>
>> Regards,
>> P.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:29, Patrik Modesto <patrik.mode...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I'll alter these settings and will let you know.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > P.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:23, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Have you tried lowering the  batch size and increasing the time out?
>> >> Even
>> >> just to get it to work.
>> >>
>> >> If you get a TimedOutException it means CL number of servers did not
>> >> respond
>> >> in time.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >> -----------------
>> >> Aaron Morton
>> >> Freelance Developer
>> >> @aaronmorton
>> >> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>> >>
>> >> On 28/02/2012, at 8:18 PM, Patrik Modesto wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi aaron,
>> >>
>> >> this is our current settings:
>> >>
>> >>      <property>
>> >>          <name>cassandra.range.batch.size</name>
>> >>          <value>1024</value>
>> >>      </property>
>> >>
>> >>      <property>
>> >>          <name>cassandra.input.split.size</name>
>> >>          <value>16384</value>
>> >>      </property>
>> >>
>> >> rpc_timeout_in_ms: 30000
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> P.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 21:54, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What settings do you have for cassandra.range.batch.size
>> >>
>> >> and rpc_timeout_in_ms  ? Have you tried reducing the first and/or
>> >> increasing
>> >>
>> >> the second ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----------------
>> >>
>> >> Aaron Morton
>> >>
>> >> Freelance Developer
>> >>
>> >> @aaronmorton
>> >>
>> >> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 27/02/2012, at 8:02 PM, Patrik Modesto wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:25, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Did you see the notes here?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure what do you mean by the notes?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'm using the mapred.* settings suggested there:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     <property>
>> >>
>> >>         <name>mapred.max.tracker.failures</name>
>> >>
>> >>         <value>20</value>
>> >>
>> >>     </property>
>> >>
>> >>     <property>
>> >>
>> >>         <name>mapred.map.max.attempts</name>
>> >>
>> >>         <value>20</value>
>> >>
>> >>     </property>
>> >>
>> >>     <property>
>> >>
>> >>         <name>mapred.reduce.max.attempts</name>
>> >>
>> >>         <value>20</value>
>> >>
>> >>     </property>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> But I still see the timeouts that I haven't with cassandra-all 0.8.7.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> P.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HadoopSupport#Troubleshooting
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>
>

Reply via email to