HH - this is hinted handoff? 2012/4/11 Igor <i...@4friends.od.ua>
> On 04/11/2012 11:49 AM, R. Verlangen wrote: > > Not everything, just HH :) > > I hope this works for me for the next reasons: I have quite large RF (6 > datacenters, each carry one replica of all dataset), read and write at CL > ONE, relatively small TTL - 10 days, I have no deletes, servers almost > never go down for hour. So I expect that even if I loose some HH then some > other replica will reply with data. Is it correct? > > Hope this works for me, but can not work for others. > > > Well, if everything works 100% at any time there should be nothing to > repair, however with a distributed cluster it would be pretty rare for that > to occur. At least that is how I interpret this. > > 2012/4/11 Igor <i...@4friends.od.ua> > >> BTW, I heard that we don't need to run repair if all your data have TTL, >> all HH works, and you never delete your data. >> >> >> On 04/11/2012 11:34 AM, ruslan usifov wrote: >> >> Sorry fo my bad english, so QUORUM allow doesn't make repair regularity? >> But form your anser it does not follow >> >> 2012/4/11 R. Verlangen <ro...@us2.nl> >> >>> Yes, I personally have configured it to perform a repair once a week, as >>> the GCGraceSeconds is at 10 days. >>> >>> This is also what's in the manual >>> http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations#Repairing_missing_or_inconsistent_data >>> (point >>> 2) >>> >>> >>> 2012/4/11 ruslan usifov <ruslan.usi...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> I have follow question, if we Read and write to cassandra claster with >>>> QUORUM consistency level, does this allow to us do not call nodetool repair >>>> regular? (i.e. every GCGraceSeconds) >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With kind regards, >>> >>> Robin Verlangen >>> www.robinverlangen.nl >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > With kind regards, > > Robin Verlangen > www.robinverlangen.nl > > >
