On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 16:57 +1200, aaron morton wrote: > Sorry I don't understand your question. > > Can you explain it a bit more or maybe someone else knows.
I believe the question is why is the maximum 2**127 and not 0xffffffffffffffff Tim > > Cheers > > ----------------- > Aaron Morton > Freelance Developer > @aaronmorton > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > On 27/08/2012, at 7:16 PM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardo...@urssaf.fr> wrote: > > > > > Thank you Aaron. > > This limit was pushed down in RandomPartitioner but the question still > > exists... > > > > > > aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> a écrit sur 26/08/2012 23:35:50 : > > > > > > AbstractHashedPartitioner > > > does not exist in the trunk. > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git; > > > a=commitdiff;h=a89ef1ffd4cd2ee39a2751f37044dba3015d72f1 > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > ----------------- > > > Aaron Morton > > > Freelance Developer > > > @aaronmorton > > > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > > > > > On 24/08/2012, at 10:51 PM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardo...@urssaf.fr> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > AbstractHashedPartitioner defines a maximum of 2**127 hence an > > > order of (2**127)+1. > > > > I'd say that tokens of such partitioners are intented to be > > > distributed in Z/(127), hence a maximum of (2**127)-1. > > > > Could there be a mix up between maximum and order? > > > > This is a detail but could someone confirm/invalidate? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Romain > > > >
