We are considering creating our own InputFormat for hadoop and running the 
tasktrackers on every 3rd node(ie. RF=3) such that we cover all ranges.  Our 
M/R overhead appears to be 13 days vs. 12.5 hours on just reading SSTAbles 
directly on our current data set.

I personally don't think parsing SSTables(using the hadoop M/R framework) is a 
big deal from us since we run task trackers on the cassandra nodes we need it 
on.  Ie. We don't need to copy to DFS to do this I believe(at least not in our 
situation).

I already wrote a client on the SSTableReader parsing out sstables to take a 
look at some of our data while our 13 day M/R job is running(we are 4 days in 
already with no failures and no performance degradation).

later,
Dean

From: java8964 java8964 <java8...@hotmail.com<mailto:java8...@hotmail.com>>
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" 
<user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 12:06 PM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" 
<user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: RE: map/reduce performance time and sstable readerŠ.

I am trying to do the same thing, as in our project, we want to load the data 
from Cassandra into Hadoop cluster, and SSTable is one obvious option, as you 
can get the changed data since last batch loading directly from the SSTable 
incremental backup files.

But, based on so far my research (I maybe wrong, as I just did limited research 
about the SSTable, I hope someone in this forum can tell me that I am wrong), 
it maybe is NOT a good option:

1) sstable2json looks like NOT a scalable solution to get the data out from the 
Cassandra, and it needs the access to "data" directory to get some meta data 
from system keyspace for the column family data dumped, which maybe is not an 
option in your MR environment.
2) So far I am thinking reuse the same API as being used in the sstable2json, 
but I have to provide these metadata in the API, like validator 
types/partitioner etc. I am surprised that as a backup, the column family 
SSTable dump files DOESN't contain these information by itself. Shouldn't it 
find out this from the SSTable files(ONLY) by itself?
3) The big trouble comes this if you want to parse the SSTables in  your MR 
code. The API internal will load the Index/Compression_Info information from 
the Index/Compression files, which it assumes located in the same place  as the 
data file, but it will use the FileSteam internal. So if these data files are 
in the DFS (Distributed File System), so far, I didn't find a way to tell the 
API to use the stream from the DFS, instead of Local File Input stream. So 
basically you have 2 options: a) Copy these files from DSF to local file system 
(Same as what Knewton guys did at https://github.com/Knewton/KassandraMRHelper) 
b) Develop your own API to access the SStable files directly ( My guess is that 
Netflix guys probably did this way. They have a project called 
"Aegisthus<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra#History>" (See here: 
http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/02/aegisthus-bulk-data-pipeline-out-of.html), 
but it is not open source.
4) About the performance, I am not sure, as SSTable2Json underline is using the 
same Cassandra API, but running in MR give us some support in scalability, as 
we can reuse the Hadoop framework for a lot of benefits it can bring.

Yong

> From: dean.hil...@nrel.gov<mailto:dean.hil...@nrel.gov>
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:25:09 -0600
> Subject: map/reduce performance time and sstable readerŠ.
>
> Has anyone done performance tests on sstable reading vs. M/R? I did a quick 
> test on reading all SSTAbles in a LCS column family on 23 tables and took the 
> average time it took sstable2json(to /dev/null to make it faster) which was 7 
> seconds per table. (reading to stdout took 16 seconds per table). This then 
> worked out to an estimation of 12.5 hours up to 27 hours(from to stdout 
> calculation). I am suspecting the map/reduce time may be much worse since 
> there are not as many repeated rows in LCS????
>
> Ie. I am wondering if I should just read from SSTAbles directly instead of 
> map/reduce? I am about to dig around in the code of M/R and sstable2json to 
> see what each is doing specifically.
>
> Thanks,
> Dean

Reply via email to